Government Hiding More than 20 Missouri Giant Skeleton Reports?

There have been stories for years that many in Missouri found giant skeletons in caves and mounds, yet much of that history seems to now be erased. Why would the government want to hide dozens of giant skeleton reports that have been documented by newspapers and even Abraham Lincoln.

The legend of giant skeletons in Missouri goes back centuries, but for the sake of brevity, I'll focus on only a few. First, there was a report in 1933 by the Steelville Ledger in Steelville, Missouri of giant skeleton remains found.

The following year on April 25, 1934, JD Crain reportedly also found giant skeletal remains at Lake of the Ozarks that was reported on by The Springfield Daily News.

There are so many Missouri reports of the lost giants that The History Channel launched a special series called Search for the Lost Giants to explore what happened to those remains. In total, there are more than 20 reports of giant skeleton remains in Missouri over the past 160 years.

What kind of human would have such a giant skeletal physique?

Theories vary from very tall Native Americans to the legendary giants spoken of in the Bible.

What happened to those skeletal bones that were recovered in Missouri and why can't we see them today?

Many claim that the bones were taken by representatives from The Smithsonian Institution. However, if you ask to see those bones today, you will be denied.

You really need to see what was uncovered by The Why Files. They found a government document called Implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Reparation Act. The government exempted The Smithsonian from having to return the bones.

What I don't understand is how the government benefits from allowing this history to be studied? What are they hiding and why?

Think this is all just a wild conspiracy theory? Look at the words of Abraham Lincoln.

Definitely watch what The Why Files uncovered about this mystery.

Fortunately, they cannot go back into history and erase all of those newspaper reports, but there is still no explanation about why this topic needs to be forbidden.